Yesterday I stumbled upon SmallBasic, while looking for something else. It is an interesting little project by Microsoft to create an entry level language to teach programming. It is a mix of toned down BASIC and Logo. Since the language (or is it an application) is still in infancy, version 0.5 released recently, I will try not to be too harsh on it.
Sample program with obligatory screenshot
Showing Flickr Image
1: url = Flickr.GetPictureOfMoment()
2: img = ImageList.LoadImage(url)
3: GraphicsWindow.Title = url
5: GraphicsWindow.Height = ImageList.GetHeightOfImage(img)
6: GraphicsWindow.Width = ImageList.GetWidthOfImage(img)
The limited with just 15 keywords is good too.
The learner does not need to initialise variables, there is no
No variable scopes, everything is global.
Before you think it will bring forth another set of programmers, like the much maligned VB programmers, remember this is for 10 yr olds.
In general, it feels light weight and fast.
The application itself depends on .NET 3.5 which still does not have a large installed base.
For sake of simplicity, all libraries are more or less global objects. This approach might not scale when more libraries are added.
The turtle is non-interactive and verbose. How I long for the good old code which went something like:
1: FD 100
2: RT 90
3: REPEAT 4
- Same application in SmallBasic:
1: For i=1 To 4
Notice there is no area to type the next command, all commands to turtle have to be specified upfront.
- The syntax is very ugly. Why the curly brackets?
1: ‘You need the curly brackets for all function calls.
3: ‘Why not drop the brackets for zero argument functions?
The current syntax forces the learner to understand the different between a property and a function. Completely unimportant for the target audience.
To add to that it is not consistent, you still have a few functions that have a property pattern (GetSomething, SetSomething)
What would look better, VB.NET style or a mix of original BASIC and ruby?
I really dig for anything related to teaching programming to children. Although my daughter is too young to program, I draw from my experiences of learning programming. I, like countless others, was introduced to BASIC and Logo as the first programming language. But I was not interested in adding 2 numbers or drawing a square. I became interested in programming when I was introduced to dBase III (remember it?). When I found I could save and retrieve data and manipulate it, I was sold.
Similarly, I think, today’s internet generation might be sold on network based interactivity. SmallBasic takes initial steps in that direction by having a Network object and a Flickr object. This will be a good direction to pursue and add more libraries for APIs from other web apps. Hackety Hack approach, I guess.
The other thing interesting to this generation is gaming and multimedia. Although Scratch, Alice, Phun and others like Phrogram are filling that need, a few libraries towards that end (animations, effects, sound, video), will not hurt at all.
In conclusion, I think this is a very interesting start, but needs to cover much ground, while remaining true to the promise of simplicity.