<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Open-Source on Dr. Hitesh Sarda</title>
		<link>https://hitesh.in/tags/open-source/</link>
		<description>Recent content in Open-Source on Dr. Hitesh Sarda</description>
		<generator>Hugo</generator>
		<language>en-US</language>
		
		
		
		
			<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
			<atom:link href="https://hitesh.in/tags/open-source/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
			<item>
				<title>The open-weight model that was trained to know less about security</title>
				<link>https://hitesh.in/2026/open-weight-model-trained-to-know-less/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://hitesh.in/2026/open-weight-model-trained-to-know-less/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;When Moonshot released &lt;a href=&#34;https://www.kimi.ai/blog/kimi-k3-1-pro&#34;&gt;Kimi K3.1 Pro&lt;/a&gt; this week, the benchmark table was the usual one: 65.7% on Terminal-Bench 4.0 against 66.4% for Claude Opus 5.5, a 1-million-token context window, weights promised by November 4. The line that matters for a buyer is further down. &amp;ldquo;For the open-weight release of K3.1 Pro, we identified and removed cyber-related data from both training stages.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;They also published what it cost. Without the removal, the checkpoint solves 90.5% of their cyber benchmark problems at pass@3. The final model solves 81.0%. That is a vendor-reported number on a vendor-chosen benchmark, so treat it as a direction, not a measurement. But it is a rare thing: a lab telling you exactly how much capability it took out on purpose.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Cheap to fork, costly to keep: AI redraws build versus buy</title>
				<link>https://hitesh.in/2026/cheap-to-fork-costly-to-keep/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://hitesh.in/2026/cheap-to-fork-costly-to-keep/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;The argument that &lt;a href=&#34;https://blog.exe.dev/devtools-must-be-open-source&#34;&gt;developer tools must now be open source&lt;/a&gt; rests on a small, concrete observation: an AI agent can fork an open-source tool, bend it to fit exactly how you work, and then run a nightly rebase that folds upstream updates into your version while you sleep. Customizing software used to be a project you staffed. Now it&amp;rsquo;s a prompt you write once. The author keeps the point aimed at developer tools. I think it reaches the oldest decision in enterprise software, and moves it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>The Internet Doesn&#39;t Need a Second YouTube</title>
				<link>https://hitesh.in/2026/the-internet-doesnt-need-a-second-youtube/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://hitesh.in/2026/the-internet-doesnt-need-a-second-youtube/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;I have spent a good part of my career on two very different kinds of software: products built to reach millions, and internal tools built for a few hundred people who could not do their jobs without them. Only one of those gets called a success story. The other gets called &amp;ldquo;niche,&amp;rdquo; usually by someone who has never had to actually use the alternative.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;That divide is exactly what played out this week around &lt;a href=&#34;https://github.com/Chocobozzz/PeerTube&#34;&gt;PeerTube&lt;/a&gt;, an open-source, federated video platform that just shipped a major release after seven years of quiet development by Framasoft, a French nonprofit. The reaction split cleanly. One camp: interesting technology, doomed — no audience, no money, clunky to use. The other camp: you&amp;rsquo;re asking it to win a game it was never trying to play. I think the second camp is right, and I think the argument itself says more about how warped our idea of &amp;ldquo;success&amp;rdquo; has become than anything about the software.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Paying for the tools that power everything</title>
				<link>https://hitesh.in/2026/paying-for-open-source-tools/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://hitesh.in/2026/paying-for-open-source-tools/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;Mitchell Hashimoto just pledged $400,000 to the Zig Software Foundation. That brings his personal total to $700,000 across two donations. If you haven&amp;rsquo;t heard of Zig, it&amp;rsquo;s a systems programming language, a modern alternative to C that has been gaining real traction over the last few years. Hashimoto is the founder of HashiCorp (Terraform, Vault, Consul) and has, since leaving that company, been building Ghostty, a terminal emulator written largely in Zig.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
